Approval Checklist:
Art:
Art Present?:y
Art clear?:y
Gen number?:y
All limbs shown?:y
Reasonably Comparable to Ancestor?:y
Realistic additions?:y

Name:
Binomial Taxonomic Name?:y
Creator?:y

Ancestor:
Listed?:y
What changes?:
External?:
Internal?: fewer electroplaques (electricity producing cells), more elastic bands, the development of sproingase
Behavioral/Mental?:
Are Changes Realistic?:
New Genus Needed?: (If yes, list why)

Habitat:
Type?:3
Flavor?:1
Connected?:y
Wildcard?:

Size:
Same as Ancestor?:n
Within range?:y
Exception?:

Support:
Same as Ancestor?:n
Does It Fit Habitat?:y
Reasonable changes (if any)?: elaboration
Other?:

Diet:
Same as Ancestor?: n
Transition Rule?:y
Reasonable changes (if any)?: y, introduction of new kinetivore diet is explained in description, even with a nice protein name.

Respiration:
Same as Ancestor?: n
Does It Fit Habitat?:y
Reasonable changes (if any)?: y elaborated
Other?:

Thermoregulation:
Same as Ancestor?:n
Does It Fit Habitat?:y
Reasonable changes (if any)?: y elaborated
Other?:

Reproduction:
Same as Ancestor?: y
Does It Fit Habitat?:y
Reasonable changes (if any)?:
Other?: streamlined the terminology, very good

Description:
Length?: good
Capitalized correctly?: y
Replace/Split from ancestor?: split
Other?: the introduction of this new diet method interesting. Unique use of the elastic tissue.

Opinion: Approved

Approval Checklist:
Art:
Art Present?:y
Art clear?:y
Gen number?:y
All limbs shown?:y
Reasonably Comparable to Ancestor?:y
Realistic additions?:y

Name:
Binomial Taxonomic Name?:y
Creator?:y

Ancestor:
Listed?:y
What changes?:
External?: wider fins
Internal?: villi to filter prey
Behavioral/Mental?:swim upside down deeper in water to see predators and warn school members
Are Changes Realistic?:y
New Genus Needed?: y, villi

Habitat:
Type?:1
Flavor?:1
Connected?:y
Wildcard?:

Size:
Same as Ancestor?:n
Within range?:y
Exception?:

Support:
Same as Ancestor?:y
Does It Fit Habitat?:n/a
Reasonable changes (if any)?:
Other?:

Diet:
Same as Ancestor?:n
Transition Rule?:y
Reasonable changes (if any)?: yes, loss of detritivore

Respiration:
Same as Ancestor?: n
Does It Fit Habitat?: y
Reasonable changes (if any)?:y, elaborated
Other?: needs to specify if passive

Thermoregulation:
Same as Ancestor?: n
Does It Fit Habitat?:y
Reasonable changes (if any)?: y elaborated
Other?:

Reproduction:
Same as Ancestor?:y
Does It Fit Habitat?:y
Reasonable changes (if any)?:
Other?:

Description:
Length?: okay
Capitalized correctly?: y
Replace/Split from ancestor?: split
Other?:

Opinion: pending, respiration needs clarifying

Approval Checklist:
Art:
Art Present?:y
Art clear?:y
Gen number?:y
All limbs shown?:y
Reasonably Comparable to Ancestor?:y
Realistic additions?:y

Name:
Binomial Taxonomic Name?:y
Creator?:y

Ancestor:
Listed?:y
What changes?:
External?: eyes form hammerhead shape
Internal?: ovoviparious
Behavioral/Mental?: swims upside down
Are Changes Realistic?: y
New Genus Needed?: new reproduction method, eyes arranged different

Habitat:
Type?:1
Flavor?:1
Connected?:
Wildcard?:

Size:
Same as Ancestor?:n
Within range?:y
Exception?:

Support:
Same as Ancestor?:y
Does It Fit Habitat?:n/a
Reasonable changes (if any)?:
Other?:

Diet:
Same as Ancestor?: y? needs to actually list what form of diet.
Transition Rule?:
Reasonable changes (if any)?:

Respiration:
Same as Ancestor?: n
Does It Fit Habitat?: y
Reasonable changes (if any)?: y, elaboration
Other?: should specify if passive, ancestor states it is covered in pores, with large ones on head.

Thermoregulation:
Same as Ancestor?: n
Does It Fit Habitat?:y
Reasonable changes (if any)?: elaborated
Other?:

Reproduction:
Same as Ancestor?:n
Does It Fit Habitat?:y
Reasonable changes (if any)?:y
Other?:

Description:
Length?: okay
Capitalized correctly?: y
Replace/Split from ancestor?: split
Other?: diet needs specifying, respiration needs specifying.

Opinion: pending, needs specifications.

"Respiration: Cutaneous"

passive?


ancestor says

"To help with breathing while almost entirely buried, the periscope waterworm has adapted specialized pores on top of its head. These pores are larger than the average ones which cover the body and allow greater oxygen intake through the skin while buried."

would it not continue to involve this specialized equipment?

I'm not sure what the plasmoid is here.

"Size: 20cm to 50cm (individual plasmoid); 1-3 meter wide (colonies)"

I would have assumed the colony itself was the plasmoid, with many ooze cells combining into one mass of cytoplasm.

Mandela's Tasseled Volleypom

Ancestor:
Creator: colddigger
Habitat: South Darwin Plains, South Darwin Highvelt
Size: 10 meters tall
Diet: photosynthesis

Mandela's Tasseled Volleypom split from its ancestor to live more inland, primarily found in dense thickets near waterways with the undergrowth dominated by immature and stunted root suckers. Their thinner trunks often fork multiple times resulting in several leading points of growth. The bark is relatively smooth, old layers quickly being dropped away to shed possible parasites and prevent any krugg, vermee, or floraverm, infestations from occurring. The roots sucker readily along their length, giving rise to clone trees. Suckers appear at the base of the trunk as well, quickly replacing the main body if it is broken or dies suddenly. They may potentially give rise to a second, third, or fourth trunk with the original entirely intact as well. The growing tips are colored a deep maroon due to pigmented defensive compounds that deter voracious herbivores such as floraverms from destroying the new growth.

The leaves form a fluffy canopy varying in color leaf to leaf as light and wind exposure changes, just as in its ancestor volleypoms. The summer and winter leaves have similar growth habit to the Contorted Volleypom, pinnate and needle-like in shape respectively. The edges of the summer leaf tend to be choppier and toothier than their ancestor, this choppiness is due to multiple dominate and subordinant tracheal veins occuring, creating a mild redundancy that buffers against leaf damage from herbivory as the bottlenecking in tissue makes sealing the damage off easier. The tip of the winter leaf happens to be thicker than their ancestors winter leaf.

The microsporangia clusters have taken on a different growth habit. They no longer form loose clusters of units, rather they now growth in single file chains hanging down from branches. New units are added at the growing end of the chain, with the chains being able to reach lengths of up to 2 meters. The units in these chains all open within a short time of one another, and their arrangement allows for the creation of spore clouds that cover large vertical areas early on while dispersing. Microsporangia begin appearing on trees 1 meter tall, albeit very short lengths.

Megasporangia grow as solitary units on twigs and are typically 10-15 cm in length. They over time lose the hollow pocket behind the reproductive portion of the sporangium, the reproductive portion actually sinking into the voided area. Toward the trilobed tip of the sporangium a three pointed beak occurs with an inner surface for catching and funneling in microspores. This structure increases area for capture, while providing greater obstacle to potential predation of the megaspores. Inside the sporangium are only three very large, hard, megaspores. With their hardened spore walls, or shells, they are very nut-like and hold quite a bit of energy dense meat to allow for a quick growing sprout. Megasporangia will begin appearing on trees 3-4 meters tall, but can occur on root suckers of mature trees when only 1 meter tall, though in low number. Once the megaspores are mature the sporangium will dry and may release them directly from the tree, the beak pointing away from the tree and shaped like a short slide to direct the fall of the nut. More often though the entire sporangium falls from the tree and fauna may carry it off to feast, dropping one or two lucky megaspores along the way.

A truly fantastic addition.

I was interested in making a wiggly worm split from the ancestor, but honestly I can also descend it from this so no worries.

I think I will make that descendent next gen.

That horn on the male looks like it could do some real eye damage

Its fur-like wooly helps

Woolly... Cotton?

helps insulate it from the color

From the cold

and will sneaking into

Sneak into

and feeding from their food

And feed from

Like its ancestor it has It has petrolignin (

Duplication

mating season on the fall.

In the fall




....

There are a few odd placements or lack of commas and periods as well.

I think at this point mangals have been agreed to be ccomparable to river biomes that bisect a given biome in function, in that they are represented on map as a bold line distinct from surrounding biomes, but do not obstruct passage despite being a defining border line between two distinct biomes.

Though I do think they ought to be approached in more differently in how they are applied to the map, more restricted, I think this understanding of the set up should work to solve issue.

Approval Checklist:
Art:
Art Present?:y
Art clear?:y
Gen number?:y
All limbs shown?:y
Reasonably Comparable to Ancestor?:y
Realistic additions?:y

Name:
Binomial Taxonomic Name?:y
Creator?:y

Ancestor:
Listed?:y
What changes?:
External?: smaller wings, longer legs
Internal?: increased photosynthesis in wings
Behavioral/Mental?: ground nesting
Are Changes Realistic?:y
New Genus Needed?: not very flight based

Habitat:
Type?:1
Flavor?:3
Connected?:y
Wildcard?:

Size:
Same as Ancestor?:n
Within range?:y
Exception?:

Support:
Same as Ancestor?:n
Does It Fit Habitat?:y
Reasonable changes (if any)?:y elaborated
Other?:

Diet:
Same as Ancestor?:n
Transition Rule?:y
Reasonable changes (if any)?: y, omnivore now

Respiration:
Same as Ancestor?: y
Does It Fit Habitat?:y
Reasonable changes (if any)?:
Other?:

Thermoregulation:
Same as Ancestor?:y
Does It Fit Habitat?:y
Reasonable changes (if any)?:
Other?:

Reproduction:
Same as Ancestor?:y
Does It Fit Habitat?:y
Reasonable changes (if any)?:
Other?:

Description:
Length?: short
Capitalized correctly?: y
Replace/Split from ancestor?: split
Other:

Opinion: Approved

Approval Checklist:
Art:
Art Present?:y
Art clear?:y
Gen number?:y
All limbs shown?:y
Reasonably Comparable to Ancestor?:y
Realistic additions?:y

Name:
Binomial Taxonomic Name?:y
Creator?:y

Ancestor:
Listed?:y
What changes?:
External?: loss of ears, permanent curve in tail
Internal?: sound conducting fats and jaw tissues for hearing
Behavioral/Mental?: birthing on ice, molting coat all at once, dig ice burrows with tusks
Are Changes Realistic?:y
New Genus Needed?: y, new hearing

Habitat:
Type?:3
Flavor?:3
Connected?:y
Wildcard?:

Size:
Same as Ancestor?:n
Within range?:y
Exception?:

Support:
Same as Ancestor?:y
Does It Fit Habitat?:y
Reasonable changes (if any)?:
Other?:

Diet:
Same as Ancestor?:n
Transition Rule?:y
Reasonable changes (if any)?:y, scavenger added

Respiration:
Same as Ancestor?:y
Does It Fit Habitat?:y
Reasonable changes (if any)?:
Other?:

Thermoregulation:
Same as Ancestor?:y
Does It Fit Habitat?:y
Reasonable changes (if any)?:
Other?:

Reproduction:
Same as Ancestor?:y
Does It Fit Habitat?:y
Reasonable changes (if any)?:
Other?:

Description:
Length?: good
Capitalized correctly?:y
Replace/Split from ancestor?:split
Other?:

Opinion: Approved

I could see this leading to a more sessile angler using colorful bait, and a fast launching tongue.

Very squat and silly looking.

Also, the nasal gills would allow it to be a more shimmering twilight predator rather than shallower regions.

I am wondering how long they take to mature, mostly due to pondering rearing them in mangal cages as colorful food.

this lineage is a weird one.

Approval Checklist:
Art:
Art Present?:y
Art clear?:y
Gen number?:y
All limbs shown?:y
Reasonably Comparable to Ancestor?:y
Realistic additions?:y

Name:
Binomial Taxonomic Name?:y
Creator?:y

Ancestor:
Listed?:y
What changes?:
External?:narrower trunk, broader leaves,
Internal?:
Behavioral/Mental?: acts as an intermediate succession flora for woodlands
Are Changes Realistic?:
New Genus Needed?: y, though assumed the same the specification of flower structure and diversity of genus suggests to me it ought to be a new genus, and the name that was chosen is nice.

Habitat:
Type?:wallace, koseman
Flavor?:
Connected?:
Wildcard?:

Size:
Same as Ancestor?:n
Within range?:
Exception?:y

Support:
Same as Ancestor?:y
Does It Fit Habitat?:
Reasonable changes (if any)?:
Other?:

Diet:
Same as Ancestor?:y
Transition Rule?:
Reasonable changes (if any)?:

Respiration:
Same as Ancestor?:n
Does It Fit Habitat?:y
Reasonable changes (if any)?: y elaborated
Other?:

Thermoregulation:
Same as Ancestor?:n
Does It Fit Habitat?:y
Reasonable changes (if any)?:y elaborated
Other?:

Reproduction:
Same as Ancestor?:n
Does It Fit Habitat?:y
Reasonable changes (if any)?:y, elaborates it uses seeds
Other?:

Description:
Length?:good
Capitalized correctly?:y
Replace/Split from ancestor?:split
Other?:I really like the small bits of information about their distribution, such as low numbers in rainforests as they prefer organics rich soils. I'm curious about the stem formation of the shrub varieties.

Opinion: Approved

Approval Checklist:
Art:
Art Present?:y
Art clear?:y
Gen number?:y
All limbs shown?:y
Reasonably Comparable to Ancestor?:y
Realistic additions?:y

Name:
Binomial Taxonomic Name?:y
Creator?:y

Ancestor:
Listed?:y
What changes?:
External?: surface patterns,
Internal?:
Behavioral/Mental?: hides in herbaceous tufted flora, winter dormant eggs
Are Changes Realistic?: y
New Genus Needed?: n, but the new name is nice

Habitat:
Type?: wallace
Flavor?:
Connected?:
Wildcard?:

Size:
Same as Ancestor?:n
Within range?:y
Exception?:

Support:
Same as Ancestor?:n
Does It Fit Habitat?:y
Reasonable changes (if any)?: y elaborated
Other?:

Diet:
Same as Ancestor?:y
Transition Rule?:
Reasonable changes (if any)?:

Respiration:
Same as Ancestor?:y
Does It Fit Habitat?:y
Reasonable changes (if any)?:
Other?:

Thermoregulation:
Same as Ancestor?:y
Does It Fit Habitat?:y
Reasonable changes (if any)?:
Other?:

Reproduction:
Same as Ancestor?:y
Does It Fit Habitat?:y
Reasonable changes (if any)?:
Other?:

Description:
Length?: good
Capitalized correctly?: y
Replace/Split from ancestor?: split
Other?: these are very pleasant, I like the decision to not make the wings clear, and the specification of seeking protein during the breeding season suggests to me something akin to many early ectoparasites.

Opinion: Approved;

Approval Checklist:
Art:
Art Present?:y
Art clear?:y
Gen number?:y
All limbs shown?:y
Reasonably Comparable to Ancestor?:y
Realistic additions?:y

Name:
Binomial Taxonomic Name?:y
Creator?:y

Ancestor:
Listed?:y
What changes?:
External?: atavism'd back 3 pairs of wings, wings barbed like hymenoptera with "hamuli",
Internal?: stink glands replaced with bitter glands
Behavioral/Mental?: flgiht is backward, migratory, soaring
Are Changes Realistic?:y, atavism application explains wings, I think atavism in wingworms regarding wings makes sense, especially regarding this single ancestral generation
New Genus Needed?: y, new number of wings

Habitat:
Type?: global
Flavor?:
Connected?:
Wildcard?:

Size:
Same as Ancestor?:n
Within range?:y
Exception?:

Support:
Same as Ancestor?:n
Does It Fit Habitat?:y
Reasonable changes (if any)?:y, elaborated
Other?:

Diet:
Same as Ancestor?:n
Transition Rule?:y
Reasonable changes (if any)?:y

Respiration:
Same as Ancestor?:y
Does It Fit Habitat?:y
Reasonable changes (if any)?:
Other?:

Thermoregulation:
Same as Ancestor?:y
Does It Fit Habitat?:y
Reasonable changes (if any)?:
Other?:

Reproduction:
Same as Ancestor?:y
Does It Fit Habitat?:y
Reasonable changes (if any)?:
Other?:

Description:
Length?: good
Capitalized correctly?:y
Replace/Split from ancestor?:split
Other?:

Opinion: Approved;

Approval Checklist:
Art:
Art Present?:y
Art clear?:y
Gen number?:y
All limbs shown?:y, however attachment points for the wings is obscured
Reasonably Comparable to Ancestor?:y
Realistic additions?:y

Name:
B-inomial Taxonomic Name?:y
Creator?:y

Ancestor:
Listed?:y
What changes?:
External?: wing pairs are different sizes
Internal?:
Behavioral/Mental?: eats anything sweet, curls abdomen under self during flight to see, hind wings mainly for stability, front wings (not including shell) nmainly used for powered flight
Are Changes Realistic?: y
New Genus Needed?: yes, wings different

Habitat:
Type?: global
Flavor?:
Connected?:
Wildcard?:

Size:
Same as Ancestor?:n
Within range?: n/a
Exception?:y

Support:
Same as Ancestor?:n
Does It Fit Habitat?:y
Reasonable changes (if any)?:y, elaboration
Other?:

Diet:
Same as Ancestor?:n
Transition Rule?:y
Reasonable changes (if any)?:y

Respiration:
Same as Ancestor?:y
Does It Fit Habitat?:y
Reasonable changes (if any)?:
Other?:

Thermoregulation:
Same as Ancestor?:y
Does It Fit Habitat?:y
Reasonable changes (if any)?:
Other?:

Reproduction:
Same as Ancestor?:y
Does It Fit Habitat?:y
Reasonable changes (if any)?:
Other?:

Description:
Length?: good
Capitalized correctly?:y
Replace/Split from ancestor?:split
Other?: I've begun wondering if exoskeletal worms should list "living exoskeleton" in their support.

Opinion: Approved

Approval Checklist:
Art:
Art Present?:y
Art clear?:y
Gen number?:y
All limbs shown?:y
Reasonably Comparable to Ancestor?:y
Realistic additions?:y

Name:
Binomial Taxonomic Name?:y
Creator?:y

Ancestor:
Listed?:y
What changes?:
External?: loss of wings, tympanic membrane, darker coloration
Internal?:
Behavioral/Mental?: ability to interpret sound
Are Changes Realistic?: y
New Genus Needed?: yes, loss of digit

Habitat:
Type?:3
Flavor?:2
Connected?:y
Wildcard?:

Size:
Same as Ancestor?:y
Within range?:
Exception?:

Support:
Same as Ancestor?:y
Does It Fit Habitat?:y
Reasonable changes (if any)?:
Other?:

Diet:
Same as Ancestor?:y
Transition Rule?:
Reasonable changes (if any)?:

Respiration:
Same as Ancestor?:y
Does It Fit Habitat?:yu
Reasonable changes (if any)?:
Other?:

Thermoregulation:
Same as Ancestor?:y
Does It Fit Habitat?:y
Reasonable changes (if any)?:
Other?:

Reproduction:
Same as Ancestor?:y
Does It Fit Habitat?:y
Reasonable changes (if any)?:
Other?:

Description:
Length?: short
Capitalized correctly?:y
Replace/Split from ancestor?:split
Other?: " listen for danger.As it lives in generally" for whatever reason it appears that a space ended up missing here.


Opinion: Approved

Plyentree Venterpotatorus acervi

Creator: colddigger
Ancestor: River Plyent
Habitat: Wallace Tropical Rainforest
Size: 2 Meters Tall
Diet: Photosynthesis, Detritivore
Respiration: ?
Support: Endoskeleton (Jointed Wood)
Thermoregulation: Mesotherm
Reproduction: Sexual, Mucus Bound Spores, Two Genders

The Plyentree split from its ancestor to take on a more terrestrial lifestyle. They've redeveloped their singular eye for the sake of navigation. Despite having become more terrestrial, it's limbs still require a consistently moist environment in order to absorb nutrients. This leads to the larval form seeking out mud and bogs and seeps and other areas where standing water or consistent moisture exists to rest on or sink their limbs into and mature.

The reality of areas being better or worse for this use resulted in larvae accumulating in certain spots far more densely than others, resulting in piles of the small organisms attempting to reach the mud where it's wettest and push the others out. Quickly what resulted was the discovery of another source of moisture, The remnant cavities inside their neighbors.

The body of the plyents were not suited for the expulsion of their sudden intruders, but if they became too weak due to the extraction of moisture and nutrients then it became problematic for those that were feeding off of them. This rapidly selected for a two-way street where nutrients taken up by those directly in the mud was able to pass through the thin membranes of their internal cavity and the membrane of the limb stuck in them, and the passage of photosynthesis products back down to them for absorption.

This development of cooperation between individuals meant that they could just continually pile on top of one another to create larger and larger colonies. The limbs and body of a mature Plyentree are long and twist and wrap around their neighbors in order to secure the structure. The majority of photosynthesis occurs across the surface of the long body.

Reproduction is still performed with sexual spores, but rather than being released into the air The masses are oozed out in a thin mucus that dribbles down from the orifice of the Plyentree, down its sides and limbs, eventually into the orifices of those beneath it. As the spores join to form a zygote, which develops into a free embryo, the mucus it sits in is shifted from thin and runny to thick and nutrient rich. It grows to about the size of a marble then leaves the safety of the orifice and slides and tumbles down the side of the colony to the ground. Scampering off it will continue to grow, seeking light and water, and eventually settle into a new permanent home. Finding a young colony to clamber to the top of is preferable, being middle of the colony grants reproductive mucus the most mates to trickle down to before becoming too dilute by other members, while also allowing the Plyentree to grow larvae off its own directly. If no other colonies can be found it may settle into mud on its own, until another larva stumbles upon it to join and gradually form a fresh colony.

Good ol hoofer scooper

I don't see why not

Habitat needs to be further clarified in the basic information portion.

Approval Checklist:
Art:
Art Present?:y
Art clear?:y
Gen number?:y
All limbs shown?:y
Reasonably Comparable to Ancestor?:y
Realistic additions?:y

Name:
Binomial Taxonomic Name?:y
Creator?:y

Ancestor:
Listed?:y
What changes?:
External?:extended proboscis, loss of flagella
Internal?:
Behavioral/Mental?: active hunter now
Are Changes Realistic?: y
New Genus Needed?: y, proboscis

Habitat:
Type?: n/a
Flavor?:n/a
Connected?: y
Wildcard?:

Size:
Same as Ancestor?:n
Within range?:y
Exception?:

Support:
Same as Ancestor?:y
Does It Fit Habitat?:
Reasonable changes (if any)?:
Other?:

Diet:
Same as Ancestor?:n
Transition Rule?:y
Reasonable changes (if any)?:y, consumer added

Respiration:
Same as Ancestor?:y
Does It Fit Habitat?:
Reasonable changes (if any)?:
Other?:

Thermoregulation:
Same as Ancestor?:n
Does It Fit Habitat?:y
Reasonable changes (if any)?:y
Other?:elaborated

Reproduction:
Same as Ancestor?:y
Does It Fit Habitat?:y
Reasonable changes (if any)?:
Other?:

Description:
Length?:short
Capitalized correctly?: y
Replace/Split from ancestor?: split
Other?: respiration could be passive diffusion, mention of loss of flagella directly in description should be clarified.

Opinion: Approved

Approval Checklist:
Art:
Art Present?:y
Art clear?:y
Gen number?:y
All limbs shown?:y
Reasonably Comparable to Ancestor?:y
Realistic additions?:y

Name:
Binomial Taxonomic Name?:y
Creator?:y

Ancestor:
Listed?:y
What changes?:
External?: color change, smaller body
Internal?:
Behavioral/Mental?: detritivore added to diet
Are Changes Realistic?: y, though I wonder about the body size change choice given the habitats
New Genus Needed?: n

Habitat:
Type?: 2
Flavor?: 1
Connected?:y
Wildcard?:n

Size:
Same as Ancestor?: y
Within range?:y
Exception?: wingspan listed is same, body size unspecified in ancestor, clarified in this and stated to be smaller, still works

Support:
Same as Ancestor?:n
Does It Fit Habitat?:y
Reasonable changes (if any)?:y
Other?: elaborated

Diet:
Same as Ancestor?: n
Transition Rule?:y
Reasonable changes (if any)?:y, detritivore added

Respiration:
Same as Ancestor?:y
Does It Fit Habitat?:y
Reasonable changes (if any)?:
Other?:

Thermoregulation:
Same as Ancestor?:y
Does It Fit Habitat?:y ?
Reasonable changes (if any)?:
Other?:

Reproduction:
Same as Ancestor?:y
Does It Fit Habitat?:y
Reasonable changes (if any)?:
Other?:

Description:
Length?:okay
Capitalized correctly?:y
Replace/Split from ancestor?:split
Other?:I honestly wonder if anything should be living in the Drake Barrens at all if it is meant to replicate the center of Antarctica. I would suggest instead moving this further south. Shrinking the body also leaves it more sensitive to heat loss, moving this further south would help lessen the significance of this as well.

Opinion: Pending, because I'll wait for someone else to approve it or if Changeling wants to switch up the submission at all.