| QUOTE (Coolsteph @ Sep 11 2022, 10:08 AM) |
| Can you trim both images to remove excessive empty space? The little purple dot in the main image, as well as the paper border in the supplemental image, is particularly distracting. You'll also have to separate the two images in your submission. The main image goes on top, while the supplemental image typically goes in between paragraphs, or at the bottom, below the description. "derivative": You mean "descendant". Why has it lost its relationship with the Cloudbubble Cryoutine? Maintaining a symbiosis can, in certain circumstances, cost more energy than it's worth. For example, when plants with relationships with phosphorus-mining soil fungi live in soil high in phosphorus, they give fewer resources to their fungual symbionts. It doesn't really make sense that it would, all at once, lose its relationship with a symbiont crucial to its lifestyle and drop to the forest floor. It makes more sense that it would decrease symbiont investments to save energy, float in lower altitudes that usual, and end up settling on Lamarck Peak, perhaps spreading from there to Lamarck Alpine. (I would select someothing on Barlowe, but Barlowe no longer has high-altitude habitats.) Its flat, mosslike shape already makes it a plasuible candidate for such a harsh environment. Lamarck Highboreal is probably ecologically closest to what you were originally going for within some plausibility, so you could say it spread from Lamarck Peak to Lamarck Alpine to Lamarck Highboreal. However, Lamarck Alpine does have Blastrees, which are remarkably tall by alpine standards. (It's because they're glassflora, and glassflora have alien physiologies well-suited for cold conditions.) Many plants that can reproduce sexually retain the ability to reproduce asexually, and given the harsh conditions, retaining the capacity to reduce asexually seems useful. If you extend it to Lamarck Highboreal, you may be able to keep the fire adaptations in its description, since it seems boreal forests do experience fires. I can provide more information after a response to this feedback. |
| QUOTE (Disgustedorite @ Sep 11 2022, 10:37 PM) |
| It could be as simple as floating lower and lower because there's more nutrients closer to the ground until it ceased floating at all. |
| QUOTE (Coolsteph @ Sep 12 2022, 08:44 AM) | ||
That's a good point. The amount of spore, seed, and pollen aeroplankton would probably be greater lower to the ground, and possibly minerals, too. Primalpikachu, you should should also capitalize "Lamarck Peak" in the template. |