Sagan 4 Forum [Menu]

Oh is respiration for these guys stomata since generally purple Flora are plant copies?

This post has been edited by colddigger: Oct 18 2022, 12:35 AM

Please don't put profanity in the thread title.

QUOTE (Coolsteph @ Oct 18 2022, 11:43 AM)

Please don't put profanity in the thread title.

Okay, then what could I use instead? Because the reference does relate to something that has poop in their names. Also, Im pretty sure the thread titles do not end up on the wiki, so I do not think a lot of people will end up seeing this.

This post has been edited by OviraptorFan: Oct 18 2022, 10:03 AM

QUOTE (colddigger @ Oct 18 2022, 04:33 AM)

Oh is respiration for these guys stomata since generally purple Flora are plant copies?

I tend to leave respiration and support alone unless their ancestors or close relatives have already been addressed for certain features.

QUOTE (OviraptorFan @ Oct 18 2022, 12:02 PM)

QUOTE (Coolsteph @ Oct 18 2022, 11:43 AM) Please don't put profanity in the thread title. Okay, then what could I use instead? Because the reference does relate to something that has poop in their names. Also, Im pretty sure the thread titles do not end up on the wiki, so I do not think a lot of people will end up seeing this.

While thread titles do not end up on the wiki, it's still a good principle to avoid profanity.
You could say "poopy" or "fecal", I suppose. "Poopy" is not actually a word, but it's still an improvement.

QUOTE (Coolsteph @ Oct 18 2022, 06:02 PM)

QUOTE (OviraptorFan @ Oct 18 2022, 12:02 PM) QUOTE (Coolsteph @ Oct 18 2022, 11:43 AM) Please don't put profanity in the thread title. Okay, then what could I use instead? Because the reference does relate to something that has poop in their names. Also, Im pretty sure the thread titles do not end up on the wiki, so I do not think a lot of people will end up seeing this. While thread titles do not end up on the wiki, it's still a good principle to avoid profanity. You could say "poopy" or "fecal", I suppose. "Poopy" is not actually a word, but it's still an improvement.

Neither of those sound nearly as good, any other options like "Crappy"?

Approval Checklist:
Art:
Art Present?:y
Art clear?:y
Gen number?:y
All limbs shown?:y
Reasonably Comparable to Ancestor?:y
Realistic additions?:y

Name:
Binomial Taxonomic Name?:y
Creator?:y

Ancestor:
Listed?:y
What changes?:
External?: bigger, brown pigmentation to avaoid competition
Internal?:
Behavioral/Mental?: loss of fragmentation based reproduction, redevelopment of sexual spore reproduction
Are Changes Realistic?:y, the spores are an interesting development
New Genus Needed?: y, new method of reproduction

Habitat:
Type?: 3
Flavor?:2
Connected?: y
Wildcard?:

Size:
Same as Ancestor?: n
Within range?: y
Exception?:

Support:
Same as Ancestor?: n
Does It Fit Habitat?:y
Reasonable changes (if any)?:
Other?:

Diet:
Same as Ancestor?:y
Transition Rule?:
Reasonable changes (if any)?:

Respiration:
Same as Ancestor?: y
Does It Fit Habitat?:n/a
Reasonable changes (if any)?:
Other?:

Thermoregulation:
Same as Ancestor?: n
Does It Fit Habitat?: y
Reasonable changes (if any)?:
Other?:

Reproduction:
Same as Ancestor?: n
Does It Fit Habitat?: y
Reasonable changes (if any)?: y
Other?: intense change there, but probably just a thing they can do

Description:
Length?: ok
Capitalized correctly?: yesssss?
Replace/Split from ancestor?: split
Other?: boy we have a lot of flora colors

Opinion: Approved

This post has been edited by colddigger: Nov 2 2022, 08:50 PM