| QUOTE (OviraptorFan @ Apr 29 2023, 07:18 PM) | ||||||||
Then can you show off a female as well? The silk producing organs being prominent again is a very big change that should be shown. |



| QUOTE (Coolsteph @ May 17 2023, 10:50 PM) |
| Artwork on Sagan 4 doesn’t need to be perfectly polished, and even Hydromancerx’s more recent art has a few stray lines sometimes. Still, the number of instances and the conspicuousness of the stray lines and color outside the lines in the art here is significant. For the beaks, the lack of cleanup or particular artistic process chosen has even interfered with the clarity of form, which is grounds for rejecting a submission. On a related but less essential note, the lines used on the throat sac make it difficult to tell if it’s supposed to be round and bulging, like a frog’s throat sac, or flattened at the sides, like for an anole lizard. It is possible there are so many conspicuously uncolored spots because you filled it in by hand, instead of using the paint bucket tool. Try using the paint bucket tool. Deleting the Larvaback was sensible. I still don’t understand why the Neuks and Undergroundis were removed, but it’s plausible to omit them, at least. Rustmolds and Chitjorns are still on the list. Please delete them from the list. Of the 9 feedback points given in my follow-up response, you fixed or attempted to fix to 2. Or, in other words, you did not respond to 78% of it. Even though you noted the existence of spelling errors, the misspelling of “cartilage” wasn’t fixed. |
.png)
| QUOTE (Coolsteph @ May 13 2023, 02:44 PM) |
| Image: The grey coloration on its “limbs” and “head” suggest color patterning on its skin, rather than a single-cell body with discrete extensions peeking out of a test (shell). Template: There’s a spacing error between the name and the ancestor. Incidentally, if you were going to post this, it would need a scientific name, although, as this is a work-in-progress, that is less important. Description: For such a short description, it’s best to mention how they retain water in the same sentence the ability is mentioned. I know I drew Shelpads like sea turtles, but, at that scale, the “flippers” would be of little use for thrust. The flagella would matter a lot more. How do they attach to the sides of cloud grumps like “leeches”? It makes more sense they would cling to moisture on its body, like a tiny bug stuck in a dewdrop. It doesn’t make sense for it to spontaneously develop photosynthesis, even “weak” photosynthesis. Given the time scales involved, it makes a lot more sense for it to pick up organelles or individual cells from some other photosynthesize in its environment. “Parasite off” does not make sense. “Parasite” is not a verb. I believe I based Shelpads off large, relatively complex protists with "shells", such as testate amoebas. Some rhizarians can get to more than 1 cm long (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhizaria), so I probably based the size range off that. Regardless of the plausibility of that choice, I'm sure it is even less plausible that, if a Shelpad descendant were to become multicellular, it would look exactly as before. If you want a multicellular Shelpad descendant, it's best to look up early multicellularity/colonies among protists, although I believe it is more practical to simply keep the Shelpad descendant a large unicellular organism. |

| QUOTE (colddigger @ May 12 2023, 12:36 AM) |
| ''When they became much smaller than its ancestor, '' That's the only one left to switch to they for consistency sake. After that I think it ought to be approved. Could slap an average lifespan on that end sentence of the description as well to beef it up just a little. |