| QUOTE |
| TheBigDeepCheatsy,Aug 13 2022, 02:43 PM I do heavily understand the desire/need to save or resurrect species that were indeed carelessly wiped out through more absurd means like the No-Snarf and other plagues. After all, I have been known for my habit of saving species as best as I can; I did it before with the Nodents, Shrews, and Humms. However, I feel it is also important to remember that a part of having a decent biodiversity on Sagan 4 isn't just the quantity and the quality, it's also helpful to reduce the homogenization of Sagan 4 that is inadvertently devaluing some of the other species and making it somewhat harder for making submissions due to how overwhelming it can get to a degree (Although this homogenization isn't necessarily at a critical state at the moment, but the less there is, the better). I would also like to apologize for failing to notice this sooner, I allowed myself to get caught up in all the excitement in the Ark-Building Phlyer that I overlooked several details or didn’t look at them properly enough. |
| QUOTE (Coolsteph @ Aug 14 2022, 08:49 AM) |
| When going over this, it might be easier to organize by trophic level and habitat. After all, if a large herbivorous species is aggressive and quick to reproduce, and able to outcompete newcomers, but its own food sources are outcompeted by a newcomer flora, its survival chances would greatly drop. |
| QUOTE (TheBigDeepCheatsy @ Aug 15 2022, 03:28 AM) | ||||
To put it another way, while we were guilty of pruning too many branches off the tree for enough apples to grow before, we also realize that grafting too many dead branches on it could also choke out that tree and still prevent any more apples from growing. I know you mean absolutely well with this species, OviFan, and I know you are a sharp, diligent, and talented young man. But you should also let others try out saving their species as well, let Mnidjm have his turn with the Yanisflora out of consideration how he feels and you can still give some tips to him on what else he could possibly save with them in addition to the Pina and Capispine. Furthermore, he did submit his species first, WIP or not. It doesn't need to be just you pulling the weight. Plus, while I did save many species, there were even more I wanted to save, but could not and I learned to accept on sometimes letting them go while you have done your best. And as I mentioned before, having too many saved species could cause a problem with the current timeline, low genetic diversity or high, along with having too many species to work with when we already have a lot to do still. Please take my proposal because it's a very good deal and we can all get what we want and need out of this.
While I did consider that to a degree, I didn't think of it to the extension that you did. This has me reducing my number of Dobem descendants down to 1. Furthermore, the other reason for the limited number of descendants allowed for the proposed survivors is so that other people can get their species done sooner as well. |
| QUOTE (OviraptorFan @ Aug 16 2022, 08:18 AM) | ||||||
I can probably remove most of these from the list, but what im about to show are the ones I wish to keep in Tundra Goth Tree (Its only close relative lives far away and its survival would allow the survival of another taxon) Lolly Poppy (It has no close relatives that are quite like it and it would be limited to just living living at the Maineiac Polar River and Maineiac Polar Riparian biomes) Drakolantern (Its one living descendant is quite different from this species in terms of lifestyle and also lives far away) Xatakpa (While it does live elsewhere, it could still make its way to Maineiac, especially since glassflora would still be present there, plus it would be the earliest dwellers to reach the continent and would provide food for another species I wish to spread) Horned Leafshell (its only living relative is the Wading Leafshell and its respective descendants, who are quite different in terms of lifestyle due to being more tied to the water than it) Nomnom (While it does have close relatives, the Nomnom would avoid competition with them as it feeds on different kinds of flora, so I think it would survive) Ice-Angler Oropede (It may have a population on Maineiac, but they are restricted to the polar beach of the north, the superspreader would spread them to the watersheds of the continent as well which would increase their range, and they would in turn provide food for other species) Divedove (I think this species would be able to eek out a living on the rafts, as a good portion of its prey is present on those rafts and it could better access them than the slider snoa, if they do make it they would finally have a chance to diversify) Sly Snoa (They are a relatively unique taxon who is quite different from its relatives or descendants, and they would be closely linked to the Xatakpas) Leafed Swarmer (The species is pelagic once they reach adulthood, so they could certainly travel farther than if they just remained on the sea floor, plus this would mean they would be present outside of Wallace's river systems or the southern ice sheets) |
| QUOTE (Disgustedorite @ Aug 16 2022, 09:57 AM) |
| You are potentially delegitimizing the ecosystem that was made before you ever joined. I think that this "superspreader" can only do harm and I'm starting to think they should actually be banned for retroactive submissions. Do not add any species that are already extant, that is what evolving and spreading them in the modern time when continuity errors are not a factor is for. If it can be done today, do not fucking do it retroactively! |
| QUOTE (OviraptorFan @ Aug 16 2022, 09:05 PM) |
| Hm, on second thought I can agree with what you said for most of these, but I do still want to spread either the Divedohve or the Slider Snoa, preferably the former since it would then finally get the spotlight it deserves, and I proposed it making the journey rather than the Slider Snoa since it can actually swim relatively well and thus more regularly get on the rafts while hunting the small critters that are normally in its diet on said raft. |
| QUOTE (Disgustedorite @ Aug 17 2022, 07:47 PM) |
| I think we should not be needing to come up with reasons not to include species when this is blatant metagaming already. Species can be excluded at random just by saying those that did spread got very very lucky. |