| QUOTE (Disgustedorite @ Aug 27 2022, 09:24 PM) |
| Since it's a genus group that might potentially outlast the nodents, I don't want to be too clade-specific. Anything that would be poisonous to an insect can probably be assumed off the menu. |
Yes, it might be awkward to mention Dundiggers by name if it outlives them, but plents, in general, should last for a while. Therefore, a mention of whether it favors or disfavors certain very broad categories of organisms when it comes to scavenging could be appropriate. As for things that would be poisonous to an insect...that's very broad. Nicotine is poisonous to many kinds of insects (and also mites), but the tobacco hornworm has no problem with it, and small doses of nicotine are not fatal to bees. As a compromise between sheer species variety and generally unspecified "chemicals" in Sagan 4 descriptions, you could say, you could mention three specific chemicals in applicable Sagan 4 descriptions and then follow it up with "and other poisons which are typically poisonous to Earth's beetles and aphids".
Is there a reason they are generally found in "small ground flora"? Is it because they tend to be more digestible, soft, nutritious, or simply tastier than trees?
The description mentions that species in temperate regions have eggs that can lay dormant, but this also lives in polar areas. It would be best to specify, "in environments with cold winters" or "environments with long, cold winters" (to exclude subtropical environments with relatively mild winters) in the description. I wonder if this winter adaptation also applies to boreal environments.
When they feed on carcasses, do they feed on fresh, rotten, or mostly-decayed bony remains, or exploit pre-existing wounds or soft areas, like the eyes or mouth? I'm not sure if they could gnaw through thick skin, unless they are ferry specialists with stronger jaws.