
| QUOTE (Oceansky @ Mar 2 2023, 11:57 PM) |
| I think you forgot to add a scientific name |
| QUOTE (Disgustedorite @ Mar 3 2023, 12:15 AM) |
| That image is very blurry. Can you get a clearer one? |
| QUOTE (Coolsteph @ Mar 3 2023, 02:16 PM) |
| Image: The Scutestar seems to have a beak, instead of an eversible mouth patch with rows of keratinous mouth bristles. It seems you’ve tried to suggest rows with the black stripes along the upper part of the “beak”, but a line going all the way through still makes it look like a beak, particularly with the asymmetrical, beak-like shape. It may be possible for it to have developed a permanently everted beak-like structure: you’ll have to ask Disgustedorite, as Asterzoans have strange physiology. The central leg looks laterally flattened, like the fin on the belly of some fish species. Adding curved shading or adjusting the lineart at the bottom edges is the easiest solution. Template: “Beans Subtropical Beach” is oddly separated in the template. Generally, sizes are formatted as “* cm”, with a space. It doesn’t really matter for the concept or readability, though. I believe more than half of the Sagan 4 submission pages on the wiki since I joined in Generation 153 capitalize the reproductive methods. This isn’t particularly important, though. Description: It’s hard to articulate why, but “splitting from its benthic ancestors” sounds better. “Split” might have some unsual grammatical use. “Muscular Hydrostatic” should not be capitalized. “terran” should be capitalized. You could also replace it with “Earth”, although “Earth earthworm” does sound strange. “In its legs, further” “in its legs, further” “Right & left”: “right and left”. “Became fused to”: “becoming fused with”. “In order to”: I recommend “fused with each other, which”. “At max” doesn’t sound grammatically correct. “Max”, as in short for “maximum” sounds better, although, given the generally formal style of Sagan 4, using “maximum” or “at most” is better. “Much with reproduction”: “much in reproductive methods”. “Mate any”: “Mate with any individuals”. “50/50 chance, in the water”: “mate in the water with any of their own kind, with a 50% chance of reproductive compatibility”. “Nergali island”: “Nergali Island”. “Filter-feed with”: “Help the developing young filter-feed”. (“Baby” suggests it has hatched, so it’s not in the egg anymore. Using “developing young” avoids the distinction of whether it’s better to use “fetus” or “embryo”.) “Readily-made egg yolk” How is it “readily-made”? Do you mean “readily-available” or “a larger quantity of”? “To ward off”: That suggests intention. Try “which wards off”, or, better yet, “which to some extent discourages”. Since there’s a range of two to three hours on land, it would help to specify what conditions allow it to stay on land longer. It probably relates to moisture. |
| QUOTE (Coolsteph @ Mar 4 2023, 06:02 PM) |
| It seems you’ve adjusted the art so the mouth looks less like a beak, but there’s still a line suggesting a beak. I see you’ve colored over the original line with a solid color. You’ll get better results by making a custom brush. This is easy. Assuming you’re using GIMP, select a rough circle over the yellow part of the mouth (I suggest the middle, between the two dark blobs) copy it, and then find the copied image in the brush section. Select it and then use the brush over the area. (Technically, GIMP is meant for photo manipulation rather than digital paintings, so there are better programs for this purpose, but I don’t actually know how to accomplish this is other art programs.) |
| QUOTE (Coolsteph @ Mar 4 2023, 06:02 PM) |
| It seems you’ve adjusted the art so the mouth looks less like a beak, but there’s still a line suggesting a beak. I see you’ve colored over the original line with a solid color. You’ll get better results by making a custom brush. This is easy. Assuming you’re using GIMP, select a rough circle over the yellow part of the mouth (I suggest the middle, between the two dark blobs) copy it, and then find the copied image in the brush section. Select it and then use the brush over the area. (Technically, GIMP is meant for photo manipulation rather than digital paintings, so there are better programs for this purpose, but I don’t actually know how to accomplish this is other art programs |
| QUOTE (Oceansky @ Apr 20 2023, 07:01 AM) |
| Went over its description, what about it is implausible? It seems perfectly fine to me. |