"better" is a bad phrasing to use. "Its snout's shape is better-suited than its ancestor's for opportunist feeding" is fairer and more specific.

I like its shape, pattern, and pose.

edited

Approval Checklist:

Art: Y
Art Present?: Y
Art clear?: Y
Gen number?: Y
All limbs shown?: Y
Reasonably Comparable to Ancestor?: Y
Realistic additions?: Y

Name: Y
Binomial Taxonomic Name?: Y
Creator?: Y

Ancestor: Y
Listed?: Y
What changes?: See below
External?: White fluffy feathers, Dromeosaurine face
Internal?: Spreads seeds via consuming flora
Behavioral/Mental?: Increased intelligence to capability of stealing kills from Wolvershrogs, More social, both parents sit on eggs
Are Changes Realistic?: Y
New Genus Needed?: Y (Taken care of)

Habitat:
Type?: 1/2
Flavor?: 3/3
Connected?: Y
Wildcard?: N

Size: 80 cm Long
Same as Ancestor?: Y (As according to notes)
Within range?: Yes
Exception?: N/A

Support: Endoskeleton (Bone)
Same as Ancestor?: Yes
Reasonable changes (if any)?: N/A
Other?:

Diet: Omnivore
Same as Ancestor?: Y
Transition Rule?: N/A
Reasonable changes (if any)?: N/A

Respiration: Active (Lungs)
Same as Ancestor?: N/A
Does It Fit Habitat?: Y
Reasonable changes (if any)?: N/A
Other?: Corvisnapper needs its respiration updated

Thermoregulation: Endotherm (Downy Feathers)
Same as Ancestor?: Y
Does It Fit Habitat?: Y
Reasonable changes (if any)?: N/A
Other?:

Reproduction: Sexual (Male and Female, Hard-Shelled Eggs)
Same as Ancestor?: Y
Does It Fit Habitat?: Y
Reasonable changes (if any)?: N/A
Other?:

Description: Y
Length?: Satisfactory
Capitalized correctly?: Y
Replace/Split from ancestor?: Replace (within regions stated)
Other?: N/A

Status: Approved

On the size thing, I probably would have put that as not the same size but with the exception clause called. I'm glad my reasoning was understood either way, though.