| QUOTE (Nergali @ Dec 4 2021, 08:54 PM) |
| I'm a bit curious, but it looks like the flight feathers are only on the tips of the wings, wherein in the ancestor they extended all the way to where the limbs connected to the main body. Is there a reason for this, as would it not make them poorer flyers? |
| QUOTE (SpeedTowel @ Dec 6 2021, 09:26 PM) |
| Hair Nimbuses is wrote as "Hair, Nimbuses" |
| QUOTE (SpeedTowel @ Dec 11 2021, 04:15 PM) |
| Could you add the generation number to the image? |
| QUOTE (OviraptorFan @ Dec 14 2021, 07:37 PM) |
| While the coloration is great and the description is pretty good, I think the anatomy can use some work. I feel like this species has anatomy that changes a bit too much from their ancestor. Judging by the description, I feel like you should look at the Quail Raptor and the Sausophrey for reference as they are both flying saucebacks that have different lifestyle from one another. This species looks like like a kind of flying sauceback and more like a kind of songbird that was then traced over to have sauceback-like features. |
| QUOTE (Papainmanis @ Dec 15 2021, 06:47 PM) | ||
We've being over this in DMs, but let me take another approach: OviraptorFan, do you know what are your best saucebacks? these two: https://sagan4alpha.miraheze.org/wiki/Tierracolmillos https://sagan4alpha.miraheze.org/wiki/Kuraimingaku While they do make sense as descendants of their ancestors. They - much like the criticism you seem eager to bestow on my work repeatedly - don't look much like the standard sauceback. Rather, they are each building on the sauceback anatomy in very different directions, they each push the lines and use the anatomical toolset to tackle different challenges in different niches, each bursting with potential, each awaiting to see what can you do with them next. Do not relegate yourself - or others - to the role of doing more of the same. Push the god damn line. |
| QUOTE (colddigger @ Jan 7 2022, 03:07 AM) |
| Is the problem that it's legsa are not straighter? |
| QUOTE |
| By extending the length of the outer hoof-toe and growing wing feathers directly from it, it was able to function as a flexible wingtip, forming elliptical wing proportions. As the toes maintain a mostly homologous relationship, growing a longer and thinner outer wingtip-toe has also resulted in a longer and thinner inner toe to walk on. While it will still run on its hoofs, it will increasingly rely on a plantigrade pose in rest or when perching. With the main curve of the wing provided by the wingtip toe, the cannon bone extended further out while the tibia and femur shrunk, reducing the wing area under the knee but in turn allowing thick thigh muscles to stretch between the tibia and the femur, resulting in a two bar linkage mechanism |
| QUOTE (colddigger @ Jan 7 2022, 09:29 AM) |
| Isn't a two bar linkage mechanism already what a femur and tibia act like? Or are they normally one bar mechanisms acting in unison. Maybe I misunderstand. "convey rich emotional overtones that would be instinctively, " This reads like a word is missing, maybe the word "understood". "While it will still run on its hoofs" I've seen the word hoofs and hooves, both of which are proper plurals before anyone else mentions it. |

| QUOTE (Nergali @ Dec 4 2021, 08:54 PM) |
| I'm a bit curious, but it looks like the flight feathers are only on the tips of the wings, wherein in the ancestor they extended all the way to where the limbs connected to the main body. Is there a reason for this, as would it not make them poorer flyers? |