Approval Checklist:
Art:
Art Present?: y
Art clear?: Y
Gen number?: Y
All limbs shown?: Y
Reasonably Comparable to Ancestor?: Y
Realistic additions?: Y
Name:
Binomial Taxonomic Name?: Y
Creator?: Y
Ancestor:
Listed?: Y
What changes?:
External?: Y
Internal?: Y
Behavioral/Mental?: Y
Are Changes Realistic?: Y
New Genus Needed?: Y, significant body changes
Habitat:
Type?: 1
Flavor?: 3??
Connected?: Y??
Wildcard?: ...
Size:
Same as Ancestor?: N
Within range?: Y
Exception?: Na
Support:
Same as Ancestor?: N
Reasonable changes (if any)?: Y
Other?: Clarifying
Diet:
Same as Ancestor?: Y
Transition Rule?: Na
Reasonable changes (if any)?: Changed term for feeding on symbiont
Respiration:
Same as Ancestor?: N
Does It Fit Habitat?: Y
Reasonable changes (if any)?: Y
Other?: Clarifying
Thermoregulation:
Same as Ancestor?: N
Does It Fit Habitat?: Y
Reasonable changes (if any)?: Y
Other?: Clarifying
Reproduction:
Same as Ancestor?: N
Does It Fit Habitat?: Y
Reasonable changes (if any)?: Y
Other?: Change from spore covered to jerky covered is fairly minor
Description:
Length?: Okay
Capitalized correctly?: Y
Replace/Split from ancestor?: Split
Other?: Much of reproductive description revolves more around symbiont rather than description of strictly creab Walker reproduction method, because it is simple this is okay.
Opinion: Pending(why);
"signals produced by the creab shell’s eyes"
Unnecessary apostrophe